Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Cities could be compelled to allow apartment buildings in commercial zones

The Rev. Emily Goldthwaite, director of congregational organizing for Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative, testifies March 20 on a bill intended to spur development of more multi-family housing units. (Photo by Michele Jokinen)
The Rev. Emily Goldthwaite, director of congregational organizing for Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative, testifies March 20 on a bill intended to spur development of more multi-family housing units. (Photo by Michele Jokinen)

Should the state tell cities how they must permit certain kinds of housing developments within their own boundaries?

Sponsored by Rep. Alicia “Liish” Kozlowski (DFL-Duluth), HF4010, as amended, would compel cities to allow multifamily residential buildings of at least 13 units on commercially zoned land beginning Jan. 1, 2025.

The House Housing Finance and Policy Committee approved the bill Wednesday on a party-line vote and referred it to the House State and Local Government Finance and Policy Committee.

Under the bill, at least 20% of the apartment units would have to be reserved for households whose incomes do not exceed 50% of the statewide or area median income, and at least 40% for households whose incomes do not exceed 60% of the statewide or area median income.

Housing committee OKs HF4010 3/20/24

The bill is one means of addressing the housing shortage in Minnesota, Kozlowski said referencing a Wilder Foundation report published Wednesday that fond housing instability is worse this year and more renters are cost-burdened than they were last year, including senior citizens and children.

“Today, there are 114,131 households without an affordable and available home, and on any given night over 7,000 children and their families are struggling,” Kozlowski said. “The data is very clear that market conditions like the cost and availability of housing explain homelessness in our community.”

Kozlowski said local zoning codes severely restrict where multi-family housing buildings can be constructed.

“We believe our current zoning practice is part of the housing crisis and this bill you are considering today is part of the solution,” said the Rev. Emily Goldthwaite, director of congregational organizing at Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative.

Goldthwaite said racial and class biases push city councils and planning commissions to veer from their own comprehensive plans.

A number of individuals said the bill usurps the authority of cities.

Allowing development in commercial zones is problematic due to the lack of parks and sidewalks and the presence of high traffic volumes, said Jill Hutmacher, Eagan community development director.

Ania McDonnell, government relations specialist for Metro Cities, said the bill’s limitations on the number of parking spaces at multi-family housing buildings is problematic.


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...
Minnesota’s projected budget surplus balloons to $3.7 billion, but fiscal pressure still looms
(House Photography file photo) Just as Minnesota has experienced a warmer winter than usual, so has the state’s budget outlook warmed over the past few months. On Thursday, Minnesota Management and Budget...

Minnesota House on Twitter