Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Full disclosure? Bill would require it of top-earning corporations

Cracking open the books, just a bit: That’s the purpose of HF4513.

“This bill makes sure that Minnesotans and their representatives have the information that we all need to make governing decisions,” said Rep. Emma Greenman (DFL-Mpls), the bill sponsor. “How can the public and their elected representatives make decisions about how to structure our corporate tax code if we don’t know how it’s impacting our biggest companies?”

Greenman’s bill would require the Revenue Department to disclose the corporate franchise tax return information of corporations with over $250 million in total domestic sales in a taxable year. Two to three years after a corporation’s taxable year has ended, the information would be made available on a website.

The House Taxes Committee laid the bill over Wednesday for possible inclusion in a larger tax bill.

House tax panel hears bill requiring disclosure of corporate franchise tax return information 3/6/24

Disclosure of federal returns or return information would be prohibited. But Beth Kadoun, vice president of tax and fiscal policy for the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, questioned whether that was possible.

“We oppose this bill, as it violates the longstanding policy of taxpayer confidentiality and likely runs afoul of federal law that prohibits states from releasing tax return information,” she said. “And it undermines Minnesota’s competitiveness, as other states do not require similar public disclosure of confidential tax return information.”

Kadoun pointed to several entry lines on Minnesota’s corporate tax return forms in which federal income information is required. But Greenman said the bill is constructed to not run afoul of federal law, adding that information from federal returns would be excluded from what is released.

Rep. Kristin Robbins (R-Maple Grove) also sees the bill as unfriendly to business.

“We’re constantly trying to incentivize businesses to come and grow and be part of the fabric of our communities,” she said. “And the more we pile on mandates and requirements, I feel that we are undermining our ability. We need to attract labor and we need to attract capital to Minnesota. We are long-term-trends bad on both.”

Rep. Cheryl Youakim (DFL-Hopkins) views it differently.

“From my understanding, this bill just helps us get information to make evidence-based decisions on how we’re spending taxpayer dollars. We need accountability to make sure we’re spending them wisely.”


Related Articles


Priority Dailies

Ways and Means Committee OKs proposed $512 million supplemental budget on party-line vote
(House Photography file photo) Meeting more needs or fiscal irresponsibility is one way to sum up the differences among the two parties on a supplemental spending package a year after a $72 billion state budg...
Minnesota’s projected budget surplus balloons to $3.7 billion, but fiscal pressure still looms
(House Photography file photo) Just as Minnesota has experienced a warmer winter than usual, so has the state’s budget outlook warmed over the past few months. On Thursday, Minnesota Management and Budget...

Minnesota House on Twitter